CHAPTER IV
RESEACRCH RESULT
As mentioned in
earlier chapter, in order to evaluate to students’ vocabulary mastery through
flip chart media, the researcher has calculated the data using test which is
multiple choice test. Applying quantitative analysis, the researcher used the
formulation of mean score. Next, the researcher described the data as follows:
A.
Data
Description
In this chapter presents finding
and discussion based on analysis and result of data collected from
implementation Flip Chart Media in the classroom. This chapter, the researcher
would like to analyze each data that has been gotten from the teaching process
and evaluation in each cycle of this research. In this research, analyze was
started from cycle 1 up to cycle 2, because this research used action research.
Furthermore, analysis was done with observation.
1.
First
Cycle
The first cycle was done at 5th and 6th
December 2019. In this case conduct for two meetings. It carried out from
the meeting was done for 80 minute. Every meeting was done for 2 x 40 minutes.
So, two meetings were done for 4 x 40 minutes. It was done in VIII-B grade of
SMP Negeri 1 Batang Angkola, consisted
31 students. Researcher described the result as follow:
a. Planning
Before
the researcher was conducted, the researcher had to prepare and plan the
materials that would be taught to the students. It was planning stage. The
researcher made lesson plan based on the lesson plan based on the syllabus and
flip chart media. Flip chart media should meet the goal of the teaching and
learning. The goal of this teaching and learning process was facilitating the
students to memorize the vocabulary.
In
this cycle, the researcher used flip chart media. Flip chart media was related
and familiar to students for easily to memorize vocabulary. The teaching and
learning process in this cycle was divided into two meetings. The first meeting
was conducted on Thursday, December 5th, 2019. The second meeting
was on Friday, December 6th, 2016. Every meeting took about 80
minutes.
The researcher planned to apply flip chart
media to teach vocabulary mastery. Firstly, the researcher planned to brought
flip chart and gave to the students. The researcher ask to the students, do
they like flip chart media and what is advantages and disadvantages of flip
chart in the classroom.
b. Action
The
researcher administrated this cycle in two meetings. It seemed too short because
one meeting consisted of 80 minutes. The researcher prepared the materials
according to the students’ needs, interest, and curriculum applied in the
school since they focused on the flip chart media. She preferred applying the
text-based syllabus design in teaching and learning process. This syllabus led
them construct a text, to be able work both in group and individually, and to
en larger their reading vocabulary. The description of the actions is a
follows.
1) First
Meeting
The
first meeting of the first cycle as held on Thursday 5th, 2019. As
what have been decided by the English teacher and the researcher in the
planning stage, the class would be instructed by the researcher in every
meeting during the research. Meanwhile, the teacher became the observer. The
class started at 07.30 AM. The lesson lasted 2 X 40 minutes.
The
researcher came into the class together with English teacher. The researcher
opened the class by greeting the students and checking the students’
attendance. There were not students who was absent on that day. The researcher
explained the purpose was not for teaching like usual but for research. The
researcher also gave motivation and giving the learning material to the student
by using flip chart media.
Before
explain about the material, the researcher asked to students, tell to
researcher about vocabulary. Then, the researcher explained about vocabulary by
using flip chart media.
At
the end of the lesson, the researcher asked the students to tell what they have
learned in class that day in brief. The researcher make conclusion of the
lesson and then make the closing to end the class.
2). Second
Meeting
The second meeting of the first cycle was
conducted on Friday, December 6th, 2019. The researcher greeted the
students cheerfully. The researcher then checked their attendance list. They
looked sleepy at that time. After the researcher asked them what actually
happened, they answered that they felt sleepy because of the gloomy day. The
researcher did not start the class directly. Researcher though that they were
not ready yet. So, the researcher decided to have a little talk with them to
build their interest in learning today. After that, the researcher led them to
start focusing on the lesson.
In the second meeting, the researcher
brought flip chart, and the researcher explained about the material by using flip
chart media. Such as, advantages and disadvantages from flip chart media. The
researcher gave the students a flip chart. The researcher asked to students to
tell one by one picture based on flip chart media. The researcher asked to
students about vocabulary based on flip chart media. Such as, name of things in
market, in building and name of the transportation. There were many students
tell their name of things based on flip chart media. The researcher then asked
the students to try translating the word in English. The research helped to
correct them more appropriate ones. After that, researcher gave them a test
which related to the material based on flip chart media in first cycle. Before
she asked them to answer, the researcher explained what they should do. After
all students understood what they had to do, they started to answer the
multiple choice test in first cycle.
c. Observation
Based
on observation sheet, in class still had some problem such as most of the
students got difficulties. The difficult was they misunderstood about the
meaning, because the students not understood all the meaning in the test. The
students talked to each other out of the meaning when they felt bored and made
the class become slightly noisy. The last students felt unconfident with their
vocabulary.
The researcher could
conclude that there were several problems in the classroom such as;
Table.5
Problem and Solution of External Factors in Cycle 1.
|
No |
Activities
|
Problems
|
Solution
|
|
1. |
Students’
still lo motivation when learning vocabulary mastery. |
Students felt
bored of this lesson and more students seem to be no longer interested toward
English |
Motivated them
and give advice that this lesson very useful for final examination |
|
2. |
Students’
difficulties in understanding about material. |
Students lack of
comprehension about vocabulary |
Students
needed to understand more about material which were applied in the classroom |
|
3. |
Students not
enthusiastic when they are learning teaching process |
Students
talked to each other out of the topic when they feel bored and become
slightly noisy |
Students
needed appropriate the material in teaching and learning process to keep them
interested |
|
4. |
Students were
not confident to tell their opinions during the lesson |
Students still
hesitated to tell their minds because were afraid of making mistake |
Large group
and medium group activities were good at promoting students’ self –confidence |
Source:
Result Observation of Researcher and Co-Teacher
The
result of students vocabulary mastery. The total of students there are 31 students in
the class. There are some levels score of them. The mean score in the class was
70.12 score. 3 students got 60 score, 2 students got 61 score, 2 students got
63 score, 2 students got 66 score, 2 students got 68 score, 1 student got 69 score,
3 students got 70 score, 3 students got 71 score, 2 students got 73, 4 students
got 74 score, 4 students got 75 score, 2 students got 80 score, 1 student got
84 score.
Based on score of students, it could be concluded that there
were 7 students passed the Minimum Mastery Criteria (KKM), that is 75 score.
Meanwhile, the others did not pass the KKM. There are 24 students who got
before 75 score. The researcher would describe as the following table:
Table.6 Students’ Score Test in Cycle 1
|
No |
Students’ Initial |
Test Score |
|
1 |
AM |
61 |
|
2 |
DA |
66 |
|
3 |
FS |
63 |
|
4 |
FH |
66 |
|
5 |
HAP |
68 |
|
6 |
KS |
60 |
|
7 |
KY |
80 |
|
8 |
MHS |
75 |
|
9 |
ME |
71 |
|
10 |
NSB |
70 |
|
11 |
NH |
80 |
|
12 |
NA |
75 |
|
13 |
NF |
75 |
|
14 |
NJ |
74 |
|
15 |
RH |
60 |
|
16 |
RA |
60 |
|
17 |
RFWD |
84 |
|
18 |
RF |
63 |
|
19 |
RYZ |
61 |
|
20 |
SB |
73 |
|
21 |
SR |
73 |
|
22 |
SFS |
75 |
|
23 |
UR |
69 |
|
24 |
WF |
71 |
|
25 |
GS |
70 |
|
26 |
RW |
68 |
|
27 |
RF |
74 |
|
28 |
MN |
70 |
|
29 |
RW |
71 |
|
30 |
FM |
74 |
|
31 |
RK |
74 |
|
|
Total |
2174 |
|
|
Mean score |
70,12 |
|
|
Percentage |
22,58 |
Source:
Students’ result test in cycle 1
Based
on above table, it could be seen that total of students’ mean score from each
was 70.12. To know the classification quality of students’ score in vocabulary
mastery, the researcher should know the percentage of the students’ mean score.
The way were the total students who passed the KKM (7 students) times 100% and
divided to the total of students (31), the result was 22.58%. So, the
percentage of the students’ mean score was 22.58%. To know revelation of data
was done to grouped score of vocabulary mastery which the total classes 5 and
interval 5.
Based on the explanation of students’
score, 22.58% was low criteria. It means that the students’ vocabulary mastery
was still low. To make be clear the students’ vocabulary based on score. The
researcher present with computed of the frequency distribution of the student’s
score of group can be applied in to frequency distribution as follows:
Table.7
Frequency Distribution of Vocabulary Mastery in Cycle 1
|
Instrument
value |
Frequency absolute |
Frequency Cumulative (%) |
|
60 – 64 |
7 |
22,5
% |
|
65 – 69 |
5 |
16,1
% |
|
70 – 74 |
12 |
38,7
% |
|
75 – 79 |
4 |
12,9
% |
|
80 – 84 |
3 |
9,6
% |
|
Total |
31 |
100 % |
From
the above table, it was known that the
revelation of students vocabulary mastery showed that the respondent an value
60 – 64 were 7 students (22,5%), value 65 – 69 were 5 students (16,1%), value
70 – 74 were 12 students (38,7%), value 75 – 79 were 4 students (12,9%), value
80 -84 were 3 students (9,6%).
Based
on score in first cycle from the frequency distribution, it can be looked like
as diagram below:

Figure
3 the Histogram of Vocabulary Mastery Data in Cycle 1
From those conditions, the researcher realized
that the first cycle was less, or the result of first cycle was not success for
improve the students vocabulary mastery. It could be concluded that the action
should be repaired and change to improve students’ vocabulary mastery again.
The researcher should change the trick or the new atmosphere in teaching
learning process activity in the next cycle.
d. Reflection
Based
on the result of the observation and the score of the students in this cycle,
most of the students were still confuse to answer the test. Based on observation,
most of students still lack motivation. Students not enthusiastic when they
learning vocabulary mastery. The students were not confidence to speak up their
vocabulary during the lesson. The students were difficult to mastery. It can be
seen from the observation sheet.
For
this condition, the researcher realized that the first cycle was less, as a result
of the first cycle was less success for improved the students vocabulary
mastery. It can be concluded that, the action should be repaired and changed
for improve students vocabulary mastery.
The
researcher and the English teacher decided to give flip chart media full color
with the word. So, the students would be interested about it and easier to
remember new vocabulary. They would gave them more training the material by
using flip chart media. They would apply the material by flip chart activities
which were more enjoyable for the students.
Then,
the researcher designed the lesson plans and the materials that would be used
in the second cycle. The teacher-researcher also prepared the learning media
that would be used in the second cycle. The result from first cycle still low
and the researcher changed from individually to group of students. The last,
the researcher concluded that the first cycle should be repaired especially in
lesson plan, material the teaching leaning process foe the next cycle.
2.
Second
Cycle
The
second cycle was done at 16th and 17th December 2019. In
this case, was conducted for two meetings.
Every meeting was done for 2 x 40 minutes. The researcher described the
result as follow:
a. Planning
In cycle 2, the researcher still used
flip chart media to improve the students’ mastery vocabulary. The second cycle
contained two meetings. The first meeting was done on Monday, December 16th
2016 and the second meeting was done on Tuesday, December 17th 2016.
Based
on the observation in cycle 1, most of the students still low motivation.
Students were not enthusiastic in vocabulary mastery. The students were not
confidence to speak up their vocabulary during the lesson. The students were
difficult to read. In the first meeting of cycle 2, the researcher planned to
give a flip chart about name of things based on material. Next, the students were
asked to identify the vocabulary that have they seen. The researcher divided
group of the students and gave flip chart media each group.
In
the last meeting of cycle 2, the researcher planned to give a test for the
students as the second test. The meeting was conducted on December, 17th
2016. After discussing with the collaborator, the researcher planned to mastery
the students’ vocabulary as the result of Cycle 2. The students did the test in
individually. They were asked to mastery the vocabulary based on the flip chart
media.
b.
Action
In the step, researcher conducted in two
meetings. They were on December 16th and 17th, 2019. The
text type was still a flip chart media. She selected the theme based on their
lesson and the curriculum applied in the school. The implementation of the
actions is described as follows.
1)
First meeting
The first meeting of the second cycle was conducted
on Tuesday, December 17th 2019. The class started at 08.00 AM. The
researcher started the class by greeting the students and checking the
attendance list. The researcher began the lesson by telling the students about
the topic they are going to learn that day and then doing the lead-in process.
The researcher emphasized on its rules,
especially the important of being not judge material in speaking up vocabulary
mastery.
The researcher brought a flip chart media
which have full color. So, the students interest with it. The class members
looked surprise and excited. Researcher
asked the students for paying attention the person in flip chart media.
Researcher gave flip chart to the students each group. The researcher asked to
students to mastery it.
2)
Second meeting
The second meeting was held on Tuesday,
December 17th, 2019. The researcher entered the classroom. She
greeted the students warmly. It aimed to remind them about vocabulary based on
flip chat media. The researcher then checked their attendance list. Nobody was
missing on that day. That was good because all of them could participant in the
test. The researcher had a little talk with them. In this meeting, the
researcher gave a test (multiple choice) in cycle 2 to students.
c. Observation
The result of students’ vocabulary test
in Cycle 2 showed the improvement of students in vocabulary. In the result of
test in cycle 2, there were 28 students who passed the KKM. Even though there
were 3 students did not pass the KKM but they got improvement in vocabulary.
The total score of students in vocabulary was 2.676. To know the mean score of
the students’ result test in cycle 2, the researcher divided the total score of
students (2.676) to the total of students (31 students) in the class, the
result was 86.32. So, the mean score of the students in cycle 2 was 86.32. To
make be clear about the students’ mean score in vocabulary in each cycle, the
researcher would present in the following table:
Table.8
Students’ Score Test in Cycle 2
|
No |
Students’ Initial |
Test Score |
|
1 |
AM |
75 |
|
2 |
DA |
75 |
|
3 |
FS |
78 |
|
4 |
FH |
82 |
|
5 |
HAP |
82 |
|
6 |
KS |
70 |
|
7 |
KY |
98 |
|
8 |
MHS |
85 |
|
9 |
ME |
84 |
|
10 |
NSB |
84 |
|
11 |
NH |
98 |
|
12 |
NA |
92 |
|
13 |
NF |
90 |
|
14 |
NJ |
82 |
|
15 |
RH |
69 |
|
16 |
RA |
75 |
|
17 |
RFWD |
98 |
|
18 |
RF |
75 |
|
19 |
RYZ |
69 |
|
20 |
SB |
94 |
|
21 |
SR |
90 |
|
22 |
SFS |
92 |
|
23 |
UR |
87 |
|
24 |
WF |
95 |
|
25 |
GS |
97 |
|
26 |
RW |
87 |
|
27 |
RF |
90 |
|
28 |
MN |
94 |
|
29 |
RW |
95 |
|
30 |
FM |
97 |
|
31 |
RK |
97 |
|
|
Total |
2.676 |
|
|
Mean Score |
86.32 |
|
|
Percentage |
90,32% |
Source: Students’ result test in cycle 2
Based
on above table, it showed that the improvement happened in cycle 2. The
students could improve their score in each vocabulary test. The mean score of
students’ vocabulary mastery by using flip chart media in cycle 2 was 86.32.
While in the cycle 1 was 70.12. It means that the students’ mean score in cycle
2 was higher than the students’ score in cycle 1.
To
know the classification quality of students’ score vocabulary, the researcher
should know the percentage of the students’ means score. The way were the total
students who passed the KKM (28 students) times 100% and then divided to the
total of students (31 students), the result was 90.32%. So, the percentage of
the students’ mean score in cycle 2 was 90.32%. Based on the classification
quality of students’ score, 90.32% was very good criteria. It means that the
students’ vocabulary was very good criteria in cycle 2. To know revelation of
data was done to grouped score of vocabulary mastery which the total classes 5
and interval 6.
From the explanation of students’ score,
90.32% was very good criteria. It means the students’ vocabulary mastery was
very good criteria. To make be clear the students’ vocabulary based on score.
The researcher present with computed of the frequency distribution of the
student’s score of group can be applied in to frequency distribution as
follows:
Table.9
the Frequency Distribution of Vocabulary Mastery in Cycle 2
|
Instrument
Value |
Frequency absolute |
Frequency Cumulative (%) |
|
69 – 74 |
3 |
9,6 |
|
75 – 80 |
5 |
16,1 |
|
81 – 86 |
6 |
19,3 |
|
87 – 92 |
8 |
25,8 |
|
93 – 98 |
9 |
29,0 |
|
Total |
|
100% |
Based on the above table, it was known
that the revelation of students vocabulary mastery showed that the respondent
an value 69 – 74 were 3 students (9,6%), value 75 – 80 were 5 students (16,1%),
value 81 – 86 were 6 students (19,3%), value 87 – 92 were 8 students (25,8%),
value 93 – 98 were 9 students (29,0%).
Based
on score above in first cycle from the frequency distribution, it can be looked
like as diagram below:

Figure 4 the Histogram
Of Vocabulary Mastery Data in Cycle 2
From the above figure, it could be seen
the improvement of students’ mean score from cycle 1 to cycle 2. The students’
mean score in cycle 1 was 70.12 (22.58%) while in cycle 2 was 86.32 (90.32%).
Therefore the researcher concluded that the indicators of test, observation
note sheet, and teacher’s observation had been achieved in this research.
Therefore, the researcher could be ended in this cycle.
d. Reflection
The
result of students’ vocabulary mastery in both test and observation at the second
cycle showed improvement. The implementation flip chart media was able to
improve of students’ in vocabulary mastery. It can support the students to
mastery and facilitated them in learning vocabulary. It made the students feel easy
so that vocabulary not became a daunting task. They could easily memorize new
vocabulary and mastery so that they could perform the vocabulary task more
effectively. The implementation of flip chart media could also made the
students’ interest and motivation for involving their selves in the learning
process especially vocabulary.
B.
The
Comparison Result of Action
Researcher made the comparison the
result of vocabulary mastery between first cycle and second cycle. Researcher
used quantitative in technique of analyzing the data. It would analyze the data
based on the score to decide the improvement of students’ vocabulary mastery.
The formula would calculate students’ vocabulary mastery trough flip chart
media. Firstly, the researcher calculated the students’ mean score of the test.
Secondly, researcher calculated the percentage of students’ improvement in the
first cycle and second cycle.
In the first cycle, most of
students were less in identifying the meaning of words and identifying the use
of words. It could be seen from their score in cycle 1. The value above has
shown the result of students’ vocabulary mastery in first cycle. The mean score
in first cycle was 70.12 score. 3 students got 60 score, 2 students got 61
score, 2 students got 63 score, 2 students got 66 score, 2 students got 68
score, 1 student got 69 score, 3 students got 70 score, 3 students got 71
score, 2 students got 73, 4 students got 74 score, 4 students got 75score, 2
students got 80 score, 1 student got 84 score.
Actually, the all students are 31
in the class VIII-B, but it just there were 7 students passed the minimum
mastery criterion (KKM), that is 75 score. Meanwhile the others did not pass
the KKM. There are 24 students who got score before 75 score. There as the
formula to calculate mean score:
M = ![]()
M = ![]()
M =70, 12
It could be concluded that the mean
score of students in the first cycle was 70.12. Based on the standard of the
value in SMPN 1 Batang Angkola, it could be categorized as average.
Next researcher need to calculate the
percentage of students’ score who passed the Minimum Mastery Criterion (KKM).
To know the percentage of students’ score who passed the Minimum Mastery
Criterion (KKM) in the first cycle, researcher used formula below:
P
=
x 100%
P
=
x 100%
P = 22. 58%
Based on the classification quality of
students score in the Chapter III are 22. 58%. It means categorized into low.
Secondly, in the second cycle, it could
be conclude that there were 2 students got 69 score, 1 students got 70 score, 4
students got 75 score, 1 student got 78 score, 3 students got 82 score, 2
students got 84 score, 1 student got 85 score, 3 students got 87 score, 3
students got 90 score, 2 students got 92 score, 2 students got 94 score, 2
students got 95 score, 3 students got 97 score, 2 students got 98 score. Then,
from 31 students in the class VIII-B, there were 28 students passed the Minimum
Mastery Criterion (KKM), that is 75 score. Meanwhile the others did not pass
the KKM.
According to researcher and co-teacher,
the students’ vocabulary mastery by flip chart media in class VIII-B improved
significantly. The teacher calculated the mean score by using the formula
below:
M = ![]()
M = ![]()
M
= 86. 32%
Based on standard of value in SMP Negeri
1 Batang Angkola, it could be concluded the mean score was include into very
good category. `
Next
researcher need to calculate the percentage of students’ score who passed the
Minimum Mastery Criterion (KMM). To know the percentage of students’ score who
passed the Minimum Mastery Criterion (KKM) in the second cycle, researcher used
formula below:
P =
x 100%
P =
x 100%
P
= 90. 32%
The
improvement students’ vocabulary mastery from the cycle I and cycle II, it
could be seen table below:
Table.10
comparison of students’ vocabulary mastery in cycle 1 and cycle 2
|
No |
Students’ Initial |
Cycle 1 first cycle |
Cycle 2 second cycle |
State |
|
1 |
AM |
61 |
75 |
Improved |
|
2 |
DA |
66 |
75 |
Improved |
|
3 |
FS |
63 |
78 |
Improved |
|
4 |
FH |
66 |
82 |
Improved |
|
5 |
HAP |
68 |
82 |
Improved |
|
6 |
KS |
60 |
70 |
Constant |
|
7 |
KY |
80 |
98 |
Improved |
|
8 |
MHS |
75 |
85 |
Improved |
|
9 |
ME |
71 |
84 |
Improved |
|
10 |
NSB |
70 |
84 |
Improved |
|
11 |
NH |
80 |
98 |
Improved |
|
12 |
NA |
75 |
92 |
Improved |
|
13 |
NF |
75 |
90 |
Improved |
|
14 |
NJ |
74 |
82 |
Improved |
|
15 |
RH |
60 |
69 |
Constant |
|
16 |
RA |
60 |
75 |
Improved |
|
17 |
RFWD |
84 |
98 |
Improved |
|
18 |
RF |
63 |
75 |
Improved |
|
19 |
RYZ |
61 |
69 |
Constant |
|
20 |
SB |
73 |
94 |
Improved |
|
21 |
SR |
73 |
90 |
Improved |
|
22 |
SFS |
75 |
92 |
Improved |
|
23 |
UR |
69 |
87 |
Improved |
|
24 |
WF |
71 |
95 |
Improved |
|
25 |
GS |
70 |
97 |
Improved |
|
26 |
RW |
68 |
87 |
Improved |
|
27 |
RF |
74 |
90 |
Improved |
|
28 |
MN |
70 |
94 |
Improved |
|
29 |
RW |
71 |
95 |
Improved |
|
30 |
FM |
74 |
97 |
Improved |
|
31 |
RK |
74 |
97 |
Improved |
|
|
Total |
2174 |
2676 |
|
|
|
Mean score |
70. 12 |
86.32 |
|
|
|
Percentage |
22. 58% |
90. 32% |
|
Based on above
table, 28 students got improvement and 3 students got constant their score.
The comparison
score of students in cycle 1 and cycle 2 based on test showed that from 7
students who passed KKM in cycle 1 to be 28 students in cycle 2. It could be
concluded that the students’ vocabulary mastery by using flip chart media was
improved from the previous cycle. It could be provided from the total score in
cycle 1 was 2174 while in the cycle 2 was 2556. Besides that the mean score of
students score in cycle 1 was 70. 12 (22.58%) while in cycle 2 increased to be
86.32 (90.32%). To see the improvement of the result of students vocabulary
score from cycle 1 until cycle 2, researcher describe as following table:
Table 11 students mean score
vocabulary mastery in cycle 1 and cycle 2
|
Indicators of Vocabulary |
Mean Score Cycle 1 |
Percentage |
Mean Score cycle 2 |
Percentage |
|
Identifying
the meaning of words |
38.03 |
22.58% |
43.09 |
90.32% |
|
Identifying
the use of words |
32.22 |
43.22 |
||
|
Total |
70.12 |
86.32 |
Source: students’ mean core of result test in
cycle 1 and cycle 2
Based on the above table, it can be concluded that the students means
score in each indicators by using flip chart media at grade VIII-B was
increased in cycle 1 to cycle 2. The students mean score in each indicators
improved in the cycle 2. It could be provided from the mean score of students
in each indicators.
The indicator of identifying the meaning of words in cycle 1 was 38.03 increased
to be 43.09 in cycle 2, the mean score
of identifying the use of words was 32.22 in cycle 1 increased to be 43.22 in
cycle 2.
From the above data, the total mean score of students in cycle 1 was
70.12 increased to be 86.32 in cycle 2. Beside that the percentage of the
students’ mean score in cycle 1 was 22.58% (low criteria) while the percentage
of the students’ mean score in cycle 2 was 90.32% (very good criteria). It
means that the comparison of the mean score criteria from cycle 1 and cycle 2
were different. The comparison percentage from the cycle 1 and cycle 2 was 67.74%.
it means that the improvement of the students’ mean score in cycle 1 and 2 was
67.74%. to make be clear the comparison mean score of the students in each
indicators from cycle 1 and cycle 2, the researcher would describe it in the
following figure above:

Figure 5 Improvement of Students’ Indicator
Vocabulary Mastery in Cycle 1 and Cycle 2
From the above
chart, it could be seen the differences of the students’ score in each
indicators of vocabulary mastery. The indicators of students score was
increased in cycle 1 to cycle 2. The improvement also can be provided from the
students’ mean score. The improvement of the students vocabulary mastery from
the mean score of cycle 1 and cycle 2 could be seen on chart below:

Figure 6 the Comparison
Mean Score of students’ Vocabulary Mastery in Cycle 1 and Cycle 2
Based on above
result of data analysis and research finding, it could be summarized that
students’ vocabulary mastery improved in cycle 2. From the test in cycle 1 the
students mean score was 70.12 increased to be 86.32 in test cycle 2. It means
that the implementation of flip chart media can improve students’ vocabulary
mastery.
C.
Discussion
of the Research Findings
Based on the result
of the research, the researcher has proven that flip chart can improve
students’ vocabulary mastery. Vocabulary is one aspect should be owned every students
to make them master in vocabulary. It support on the theory that states at
previous chapter findings. Zeni Sarifah show that research show that there is
improvement of the students’ vocabulary mastery through the use of vocabulary
cards. By implementing vocabulary cards game the students became more confident
to speak up and easier to memorize new words. It also made the students
participate more in the learning activities and get more chance to communicate.
The improvement was also supported by the students’ average score which
increased to 68.8 from the average score of pre-test which was 49.3. [1] This research agreed with Zeni Sarifah’s research this research
also found that flip chart media improved the students’ vocabulary mastery. It
is shown the by the improvement of each indicators: indentifying the name of
words, identifying the use of words.
Nasmah Riyani
found The data
analysis each item showed that 84,84%. It means that students’ perception of
flip chart media in teaching vocabulary was categorized strongly agree.[2]
Puspita
Purnamasari show the results of this study are the
value of t-test is 5.73 and the critical value of t-table from the degree of
freedom 70 with the significant level 5% is 2. It means that the value of
t-test is higher that critical value of t-table. In other word the hypothesis
was accepted.[3]
It means it can be concluded there is significant effect of using flip chart on
vocabulary achievement
Hardiyanti show the data of result are The
result are the significant score sig (2-tailed) 0.00≥α (0.05), then H0
hypothesis is rejected and HI is accepted. Thus it can be said that there is
the effect on using Flip Chart Learning Media toward Students Biology Learning
Outcomes. [4]
From the above explanation, the researcher found the similarity with
the others researcher and the theory which is related to flip chart. It was
based on the data in first cycle 70.12 (22.58%) and 85.96 (90.32%) in the
second cycle. It means that there had 15.48 (67.74) improvements for mean score
and the percentage of students who passed the KKM in vocabulary mastery by
using flip chart media. It can be concluded that the researcher had been
success in doing the research.
D. The Threats of the Research
There
were some aspects that could threat for this research. The threatening came
from the problems of students. Students who has not much vocabularies,
students’ laziness, and students who did not know the meaning of words. So,
they did not answer the test seriously. It made noisy and disturbed others.
Researcher should explain mare about learning material. It made longer time.
There were some students who almost slept and made some noises in the
classroom.
Flip
chart is a media for students. So that, the students memorize vocabulary with
see picture based on flip chart. Students more interest to their own flip chart
that will become their own memorized material. Thus, by using this approach
students will be more fun and easy to be done. Students had motivation because
students would create vocabulary by themselves. By applying flip chart media,
students would be more active. Finally, flip chart media could improve
students’ vocabulary mastery VIII-B students of SMP Negeri 1 Batang Angkola.
[1]Zeni Safirah, “Improving Vocabulary Mastery Through
Vocabulary Cards of Grade Vii Students at SMP Institut Indonesia Yogyakarta In
The 2015/ 2016 Academic Year” (Institut Indonesia Yogyakarta, 2016),
eprints.uny.ac.id.
[2]Nasmah Riyani, “The Students Perception of Flip Chart
in Vocabulary” (University Sembilanbelas, 2017).
[3]Puspita Purnamasari, “The Effect of Using Flip Chart
on Vocabulary Achievement of the Fifth Year Students of SDN Kotakulon 2
Bondowoso” (Muhammadiyah University of Jember, 2009),
digilid.unmuhjember.ac.id.
[4]Hardiyanti M, “The Effect of Using Flip Chart Learning
Media Toward Students Biology Learning Outcomes”(Universitas Negeri Makasar,
2018), http://www.worldresearchlibrary.com.id.